Communist Cuba began on January 1, 1959 when revolutionary forces drove out the previous dictator, Fulgencio Batista (who was supported by the United States), and replaced him with Fidel Castro, a communist, as the Prime Minister of Cuba.
Very quickly relations between Cuba and the United States deteriorated as Castro demonstrated his desire for control. For example although Castro had promised free elections, the elections never took place and Castro remained the Prime Minister. Also, Castro made it illegal to leave the island without government consent. On the other hand relations between the Soviet Union and Cuba were strengthened. In February 1960 Cuba signed a trading agreement with the Soviet Union which caused Cuba , instead of relying on the United States for support, to depended on the Soviet Union. In 1962 the Soviet Union stored nuclear weapons and some of their army on Cuba ( the Cuban Missile crisis) alarming the United States.
In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed. This was a heavy blow for Cuba, who considered the Soviet Union a valuable asset. However, the Cuban government survived, due to tourism and investments from Canada and European countries.
In February 2008 Fidel Castro officially stepped down and his brother ,Raul Castro, replaced him as Prime Minister. To this day Cuba remains communist.
Works Cited:
http://cuba.globalmuseumoncommunism.org/cuba/history?page=2
http://www.historytoday.com/john-swift/cuban-missile-crisis
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/castro-sworn-in
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Monday, February 11, 2013
Cold War Heats up in Asia
1. Who was Chiang Kai-shek?
Chiang Kai-shek was the leader of the Nationalists in China. He ruled southern and eastern China, and the government he ruled, according to the U.S officials who dealt with him, was inefficient and corrupt. Chiang was abusive towards the peasants, and he relied heavily on U.S.A's aid.
2. Who was Mao Zedong?
Mao Zedong was the leader of the Communists in China. He worked hard to win the peasant's support, and relied heavily of the Soviet Union's financial aid. Mao ruled northern China.
3. How were the Communist able to take over China?
The Communists were able to take over China because the Nationalists military government was weak, corrupt and ready to fall. Also, the Nationalists abusive practices drove the peasants to the Communist side. On the other hand, the Communist government was strong, and had many peasent recruits. Therefore the Communists were able to take over China.
4. How did the State Department respond to critics that Truman's "Containment" policy didn't extend to Asia?
The State Department responded to the critics that Truman's "Containment" policy didn't extend to Asia by saying that what had happened in China was a result of "internal forces", and that the United States had failed to influence these internal forces. Also, the State Department said that if the United States had tried to do anything more than influence, the U.S would start another war, this time in Asia, that the U.S wasn't prepared to fight.
5. How did Korea become a divided nation after World War II?
Korea became a divided nation after World War II because, in 1910 Japan took over Korea. Then in August 1945 Japanese troops north of the 38th parallel surrendered to the Soviet Union, and Japanese troops south of the 38th parallel surrendered to the Americans. Therefore Korea was seperated into two parts, North Korea being communist and South Korea being democratic.
6. What is the importance of the Yalu River and what prompted the Chinese to enter the Korean War?
The importance of the Yalu River was that the Yalu River formed the border between North Korea and China, therefore the UN troops, who had fought from South Korea all the way up to North Korea, got close to that border, the Chinese fought back against the UN troops and stopped the UN troops from takeing over northern Korea. The Chinese entered the Korean war because the Chinese wanted North Korea to be a communist buffer zone for themselves.
7. Who is General Douglas MacArthur and what did he want to do against China?
General Douglas MacArthur was the American commander of the troops in the Korean War. MacArthur wanted an extension of the war into China, and then he wanted to use nuclear weapons against many Chinese cities.
8. Why did Truman relieve MacArthur from duty?
Truman relieved MacArthur from duty because MacArthur was continually criticizing Truman's policy through magazines and newspaper despite many warning from his superiors; until finally Truman tired of his policies being criticized fired MacArthur.
9. How did the war end?
The War ended with the Soviet Union and the United States agreeing on a date for a cease-fire, June 23, 1951, at the location of an existing battle line, and setting up a demilitarized zone between the oppsing sides. After another year the exchange of prisoners was agreed upon. Finally in July 1953, the Soviet Union and the United States signed an armistice ending the war.
10. He is the current leader of North Korea and was also named the "Sexiest Man Alive" in 2012.
Kim Jong-Un is the current leader of North Korea and was also named the "sexiest an Alive" in 2012
Chiang Kai-shek was the leader of the Nationalists in China. He ruled southern and eastern China, and the government he ruled, according to the U.S officials who dealt with him, was inefficient and corrupt. Chiang was abusive towards the peasants, and he relied heavily on U.S.A's aid.
2. Who was Mao Zedong?
Mao Zedong was the leader of the Communists in China. He worked hard to win the peasant's support, and relied heavily of the Soviet Union's financial aid. Mao ruled northern China.
3. How were the Communist able to take over China?
The Communists were able to take over China because the Nationalists military government was weak, corrupt and ready to fall. Also, the Nationalists abusive practices drove the peasants to the Communist side. On the other hand, the Communist government was strong, and had many peasent recruits. Therefore the Communists were able to take over China.
4. How did the State Department respond to critics that Truman's "Containment" policy didn't extend to Asia?
The State Department responded to the critics that Truman's "Containment" policy didn't extend to Asia by saying that what had happened in China was a result of "internal forces", and that the United States had failed to influence these internal forces. Also, the State Department said that if the United States had tried to do anything more than influence, the U.S would start another war, this time in Asia, that the U.S wasn't prepared to fight.
5. How did Korea become a divided nation after World War II?
Korea became a divided nation after World War II because, in 1910 Japan took over Korea. Then in August 1945 Japanese troops north of the 38th parallel surrendered to the Soviet Union, and Japanese troops south of the 38th parallel surrendered to the Americans. Therefore Korea was seperated into two parts, North Korea being communist and South Korea being democratic.
6. What is the importance of the Yalu River and what prompted the Chinese to enter the Korean War?
The importance of the Yalu River was that the Yalu River formed the border between North Korea and China, therefore the UN troops, who had fought from South Korea all the way up to North Korea, got close to that border, the Chinese fought back against the UN troops and stopped the UN troops from takeing over northern Korea. The Chinese entered the Korean war because the Chinese wanted North Korea to be a communist buffer zone for themselves.
7. Who is General Douglas MacArthur and what did he want to do against China?
General Douglas MacArthur was the American commander of the troops in the Korean War. MacArthur wanted an extension of the war into China, and then he wanted to use nuclear weapons against many Chinese cities.
8. Why did Truman relieve MacArthur from duty?
Truman relieved MacArthur from duty because MacArthur was continually criticizing Truman's policy through magazines and newspaper despite many warning from his superiors; until finally Truman tired of his policies being criticized fired MacArthur.
9. How did the war end?
The War ended with the Soviet Union and the United States agreeing on a date for a cease-fire, June 23, 1951, at the location of an existing battle line, and setting up a demilitarized zone between the oppsing sides. After another year the exchange of prisoners was agreed upon. Finally in July 1953, the Soviet Union and the United States signed an armistice ending the war.
10. He is the current leader of North Korea and was also named the "Sexiest Man Alive" in 2012.
Kim Jong-Un is the current leader of North Korea and was also named the "sexiest an Alive" in 2012
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Origins of the Cold War Outline
The U.S.S.R is to blame for the Cold War, because of the Berlin Blockade, the U.S.S.R takeover of eastern European countries, Stalin's demands at Yalta and Potsdam, the U.S.S.R's refusal to take help from the Marshal Plan, and the U.S.S.R having very different goals than the U.S.A. However, some people say that the U.S.A is to blame for the Cold War because of the Truman Doctrine.
The Berlin Blockade
- By separating the U.S.S.R's zone, Stalin clearly demonstrated that the U.S.S.R and the U.S.A were on bad terms to the world, which created more tension between the U.S.A and the U.S.S.R
- Stalin went against the wishes of Roosevelt ,who wished that Germany be reunited, creating tension for the United States
- By separating the U.S.S.R's zone, Stalin demonstrated his power over East Germany and demonstrated that he could easily operate without the Allies, creating fear and tension in the U.S.A
- By closing off East Germany from West Germany, Stalin demonstrated
- Stalin outlawed the democratic party in the eastern European countries, which forced the countries to be communist which created tension in the U.S.A
- By forcing the eastern European countries to be communist Stalin broke the promise he had made at Yalta, which created tension in the U.S.A
- By taking the eastern European countries and making them be communist the U.S.S.R spread communism, which was directly against the U.S.A's dream of spreading democracy.
- Stalin wanted to cripple Germany to ensure safety from further invasions, while Roosevelt didn't want the Treaty of Versailles to happen all over again; these different goals created tension between the two leaders and thus tension between the two countries
- At Potsdam Stalin refused to give up any power that he had over the eastern European countries in his control, therefore the U.S.A believed that this was evidence that Stalin was planning on taking over Europe to build a Soviet Empire, which created fear and tension for the U.S.A and caused Truman to adopt a 'tough' attitude towards Stalin which amplified the tension between the two leaders and made it even harder to come to any agreements at Potsdam
- At Poland Stalin demanded the U.S.S.R's border to move into Poland, which created more tension and fear in the U.S.A that the U.S.S.R was aiming for world domination.
The U.S.S.R's refusal to take help from the Marshal Plan
- Stalin refused to take money from the Marshal aid
- Stalin demanded that the eastern European countries in his control not take any of the money from the Marshal Aid.
U.S.S.R having very different goals than the U.S.A.
- The U.S.S.R wanted to spread communism, while the U.S.A wanted to spread democracy
- The U.S.S.R wanted to have a closed market, while the U.S.A wanted to have a free market
- The U.S.S.R wanted to keep Germany divided and weak, the U.S.A wanted to reunited Germany
The U.S.A is to blame because of the Truman Doctrine
- The purpose of the Truman doctrine was to prevent the spread of communism and Stalin's dream was to spread communism and so this created tension in the Soviet Union
- The Truman Doctrine was meant to make sure that the U.S.S.R didn't take over Greece or Turkey, which created tensuion in the U.S.S.R
- The Truman Doctrine demonstrated the U.S.A's distrust in the U.S.S.R which created tension in the U.S.S.R
Friday, February 1, 2013
The Berlin Blockade and Airlift
1. What is Source 37 (p. 75) saying about Josip Tito, leader of Yugoslavia?
Yugoslavia is a communist country and so, Source 37 is saying that Josip Tito,the leader of Yugoslavia, is betraying communism by taking money from the United States, because the money that Tito is accepting is money that is suppose to make countries stronger, and so make the countries strong enough to get rid of communism.
2. Why do you think Stalin was so hostile to Tito?
Stalin was so hostile to Tito because, Yugoslavia, the country that Tito ruled, was the only eastern, communist, European country that did not follow Stalin's orders. And so, Tito began accepting money from the United States, something that Stalin had forbade the eastern, communist, European countries to do, which further angered Stalin.
3. Look back at the map in Source 27 on page 71. How does the geographical position of Yugoslavia help to explain why Stalin did not take any direct action (such as sending in troops) against Tito?
The geographical position of Yugoslavia helps explain why Stalin didn't take direct action against Yugoslavia in that, Yugoslavia was one of the farthest away countries from the Soviet Union, therefore it would have taken much more time, food, supplies, and fuel to take any direct action against Yugoslavia.
4. Read Source 40 (p. 77). What reasons did the Soviet Union give for cutting off West Berlin?
The Soviet Union gave the reasons that there were technical difficulties, and so all traffic had to be stopped, and using a similar reason the Soviets stopped all barge traffic, finally the Soviets said that that there was a shortage of coal, and so, the Soviets had to disrupt electrical power from Soviet power plants to Western sectors.
5. Why do you think the USA did not believe these were genuine reasons?
The United States did not believe that these reasons were genuine because all of the reasons happened convenientally at the same time, relations with the Soviet Union had been shaky in recent times, and so the United States would have been more suspicious at any actions that the Soviet Union took, and because all of these reasons were obviously the perfect cover for the Soviet Union to seperate West Germany from East Germany.
6. How do Sources 41–43 differ in their interpretation of the blockade?
The Sources differ in that Source 41, which was written by an American Historian, says that it was the Soviets fault that the blockade continued for many years, and Source 43, which was written by a Soviet Historian, says that the blockade continued for many years because the Americans "refused to yield".
7. Which do you think is the most useful source for a historian studying the Berlin Blockade?
I think that Source 43 is the most useful source for a historian studying the Berlin blockade, because Source 43 shows the historian what it was like living in West Berlin during the blockade. However, the historian would have to be careful about trusting the source too much because the Source was written by a Soviet historian during the Cold War and so the author may have exaggerate how bad it was lving in West Berlin during the blockade.
8. Which source do you think gives the most reliable view of the blockade?
I don't think that either source is more reliable than the other, because both sources were written when the Cold War was still going, and both sources were written by historians from the opposing sides; Source 41 was written by an American historian , and Source 43 was written by a Soviet historian.
Yugoslavia is a communist country and so, Source 37 is saying that Josip Tito,the leader of Yugoslavia, is betraying communism by taking money from the United States, because the money that Tito is accepting is money that is suppose to make countries stronger, and so make the countries strong enough to get rid of communism.
2. Why do you think Stalin was so hostile to Tito?
Stalin was so hostile to Tito because, Yugoslavia, the country that Tito ruled, was the only eastern, communist, European country that did not follow Stalin's orders. And so, Tito began accepting money from the United States, something that Stalin had forbade the eastern, communist, European countries to do, which further angered Stalin.
3. Look back at the map in Source 27 on page 71. How does the geographical position of Yugoslavia help to explain why Stalin did not take any direct action (such as sending in troops) against Tito?
The geographical position of Yugoslavia helps explain why Stalin didn't take direct action against Yugoslavia in that, Yugoslavia was one of the farthest away countries from the Soviet Union, therefore it would have taken much more time, food, supplies, and fuel to take any direct action against Yugoslavia.
4. Read Source 40 (p. 77). What reasons did the Soviet Union give for cutting off West Berlin?
The Soviet Union gave the reasons that there were technical difficulties, and so all traffic had to be stopped, and using a similar reason the Soviets stopped all barge traffic, finally the Soviets said that that there was a shortage of coal, and so, the Soviets had to disrupt electrical power from Soviet power plants to Western sectors.
5. Why do you think the USA did not believe these were genuine reasons?
The United States did not believe that these reasons were genuine because all of the reasons happened convenientally at the same time, relations with the Soviet Union had been shaky in recent times, and so the United States would have been more suspicious at any actions that the Soviet Union took, and because all of these reasons were obviously the perfect cover for the Soviet Union to seperate West Germany from East Germany.
6. How do Sources 41–43 differ in their interpretation of the blockade?
The Sources differ in that Source 41, which was written by an American Historian, says that it was the Soviets fault that the blockade continued for many years, and Source 43, which was written by a Soviet Historian, says that the blockade continued for many years because the Americans "refused to yield".
7. Which do you think is the most useful source for a historian studying the Berlin Blockade?
I think that Source 43 is the most useful source for a historian studying the Berlin blockade, because Source 43 shows the historian what it was like living in West Berlin during the blockade. However, the historian would have to be careful about trusting the source too much because the Source was written by a Soviet historian during the Cold War and so the author may have exaggerate how bad it was lving in West Berlin during the blockade.
8. Which source do you think gives the most reliable view of the blockade?
I don't think that either source is more reliable than the other, because both sources were written when the Cold War was still going, and both sources were written by historians from the opposing sides; Source 41 was written by an American historian , and Source 43 was written by a Soviet historian.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Iron Curtain Separates Europe
1. What is your overall impression of Source 26 (p. 70) and use extracts from the source to support your view. (No fence sitting; you must choose one but not both)
Source 26 represents a reasonable assessment of Stalin's aims based on facts. Source 26 states that, " physical control of Europe and Asia and eventual control of the whole World is what Stalin is aiming at". Stalin was slowly taking over as much as he could. At first eastern European countries were simply in "the Soviet sphere of influence". Then Stalin began to take over the countries' governments, for example in Poland, Stalin only allowed Communists to run for the leaders. Stalin then turned on his portion of Germany, walling it off from the outside world. Stalin probably would have continued claiming countries but the United States stopped him, using containment.
2. Source 26 is a British source. Does it seem likely that similar documents were being produced by the American government?
It is very likely that similar documents were being produced by the American government, because the United States also feared that the Soviet Union would take over the world, and wanted its people to fear and oppose Stalin taking over the world. Also, the United States was in the begging of the Cold War with Stalin and so, the United Sates would want to make Stalin appear to be "the bad guy".
3. Study Source 27 (p. 71) and make a list of three different actions that Communists took to achieve power in eastern Europe. AND Explain how each factor helped.
Three different actions that the Communists took to achieve power in eastern Europe was to execute leaders from other parties, ban other all parties other than Communism, and by severely punishing those who opposed the Communist party. By executing the leaders from other parties, the Communists created fear for opposing Communism, and ensured that the people who were the most vocal about their anti-communist views ( the leaders from other parties ) were killed. By banning all other parties except for Communism, Communists ensured that a Communist leader would be voted in. Finally, by severely punishing those who opposed communism, the Communists made many people be too afraid to oppose communism.
Source 26 represents a reasonable assessment of Stalin's aims based on facts. Source 26 states that, " physical control of Europe and Asia and eventual control of the whole World is what Stalin is aiming at". Stalin was slowly taking over as much as he could. At first eastern European countries were simply in "the Soviet sphere of influence". Then Stalin began to take over the countries' governments, for example in Poland, Stalin only allowed Communists to run for the leaders. Stalin then turned on his portion of Germany, walling it off from the outside world. Stalin probably would have continued claiming countries but the United States stopped him, using containment.
2. Source 26 is a British source. Does it seem likely that similar documents were being produced by the American government?
It is very likely that similar documents were being produced by the American government, because the United States also feared that the Soviet Union would take over the world, and wanted its people to fear and oppose Stalin taking over the world. Also, the United States was in the begging of the Cold War with Stalin and so, the United Sates would want to make Stalin appear to be "the bad guy".
3. Study Source 27 (p. 71) and make a list of three different actions that Communists took to achieve power in eastern Europe. AND Explain how each factor helped.
Three different actions that the Communists took to achieve power in eastern Europe was to execute leaders from other parties, ban other all parties other than Communism, and by severely punishing those who opposed the Communist party. By executing the leaders from other parties, the Communists created fear for opposing Communism, and ensured that the people who were the most vocal about their anti-communist views ( the leaders from other parties ) were killed. By banning all other parties except for Communism, Communists ensured that a Communist leader would be voted in. Finally, by severely punishing those who opposed communism, the Communists made many people be too afraid to oppose communism.
Monday, January 28, 2013
The Potsdam Conference
1. Read Source 17 (p 68). At Yalta, Churchill and Roosevelt had agreed with Stalin that eastern Europe would be a Soviet ‘sphere of influence’. Do you think Source 17 is what they had in mind?
Churchill and Roosevelt didn't have the message in Source 17 in mind when they agreed with Stalin that eastern Europe would be a Soviet 'sphere of influence'. In Source 17 Stalin says that," Everyone imposes his own system as far as his army has power to do so". This statement is different from what Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed to. Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed to countries being influenced by the Soviet Union, Stalin was not only talking about influencing the countries but also 'imposing his own system' on the countries that he occupied.
2. Would they agree with Stalin’s views expressed in Sources 17 and 18? Explain your answer.
Churchill and Roosevelt wouldn't agree with Stalin views expressed in Sources 17 and 18, that Stalin had to occupy the eastern European countries in order to protect itself from further invasions.. They wouldn't agreed because Churchill and Roosevelt would have recognized that Stalin wasn't simply using the countries to protect itself, the Soviet Union was also taking over the countries governments and spreading communism; and the spread of communism was something that neither Roosevelt or Churchill wanted.
3. Explain how each of the three developments described in the text might affect relationships at Potsdam.
The Soviets occupying most of Eastern Europe, America having a new president and, the U.S.A developing a atomic bomb all affected relationships at Potsdam. Due to the Soviets occupying most of Eastern Europe, Trueman and Churchill were fearful of the Soviet Union's growing power and didn't want to allow the Soviet Union to claim anymore territory. America had a new president, Trueman, and Trueman was less willing to compromise with Stalin than F.D.R had been. Finally because America had the atomic bomb, Trueman was even less willing to compromise for Stalin because Trueman knew that had power over Stalin.
Churchill and Roosevelt didn't have the message in Source 17 in mind when they agreed with Stalin that eastern Europe would be a Soviet 'sphere of influence'. In Source 17 Stalin says that," Everyone imposes his own system as far as his army has power to do so". This statement is different from what Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed to. Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed to countries being influenced by the Soviet Union, Stalin was not only talking about influencing the countries but also 'imposing his own system' on the countries that he occupied.
2. Would they agree with Stalin’s views expressed in Sources 17 and 18? Explain your answer.
Churchill and Roosevelt wouldn't agree with Stalin views expressed in Sources 17 and 18, that Stalin had to occupy the eastern European countries in order to protect itself from further invasions.. They wouldn't agreed because Churchill and Roosevelt would have recognized that Stalin wasn't simply using the countries to protect itself, the Soviet Union was also taking over the countries governments and spreading communism; and the spread of communism was something that neither Roosevelt or Churchill wanted.
3. Explain how each of the three developments described in the text might affect relationships at Potsdam.
The Soviets occupying most of Eastern Europe, America having a new president and, the U.S.A developing a atomic bomb all affected relationships at Potsdam. Due to the Soviets occupying most of Eastern Europe, Trueman and Churchill were fearful of the Soviet Union's growing power and didn't want to allow the Soviet Union to claim anymore territory. America had a new president, Trueman, and Trueman was less willing to compromise with Stalin than F.D.R had been. Finally because America had the atomic bomb, Trueman was even less willing to compromise for Stalin because Trueman knew that had power over Stalin.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Origins of the Cold War: Yalta Conference
1. What month and year did the Yalta Conference place?
The month the Yalta Conference took place in was February. The year the the Yalta Conference took place in was 1945.
2. While the conference was taking place who were the Allies (Big Three) still fighting? Be specific. (Consider as well, what hadn't taken place yet that you've already studied.)
The Allies ( Big Three ) that were still fighting while the Yalta Conference was taking place were Great Britain , The United States and the Soviet Union.
3. Why was Roosevelt anxious to make concessions to Stalin concerning the fate of postwar Germany?
Roosevelt was anxious to make concessions to Stalin concerning the fate of the postwar Germany for two reasons. First of all, Roosevelt was hoping that the Stalin would join the war against the Japanese; fulfilling his commitment. Second of all Roosevelt wanted Stalin's support for the new world peace keeping organization, the United Nations.
4. What decisions did Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin make at the Yalta Conference?
At the Yalta Conference Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin decided that Germany would be temporarily divided into four separate zones. The Americans would control one, the British would control one, the French would control one, and the Soviets would control one zone . Also, Stalin promised " free and unfettered elections" for all of the soviet occupied countries, such as Poland. Stalin promised to join the fight against the Japanese as well. Finally, Stalin promised to participate in the international conference, where the United Nations would become a reality.
The month the Yalta Conference took place in was February. The year the the Yalta Conference took place in was 1945.
2. While the conference was taking place who were the Allies (Big Three) still fighting? Be specific. (Consider as well, what hadn't taken place yet that you've already studied.)
The Allies ( Big Three ) that were still fighting while the Yalta Conference was taking place were Great Britain , The United States and the Soviet Union.
3. Why was Roosevelt anxious to make concessions to Stalin concerning the fate of postwar Germany?
Roosevelt was anxious to make concessions to Stalin concerning the fate of the postwar Germany for two reasons. First of all, Roosevelt was hoping that the Stalin would join the war against the Japanese; fulfilling his commitment. Second of all Roosevelt wanted Stalin's support for the new world peace keeping organization, the United Nations.
4. What decisions did Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin make at the Yalta Conference?
At the Yalta Conference Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin decided that Germany would be temporarily divided into four separate zones. The Americans would control one, the British would control one, the French would control one, and the Soviets would control one zone . Also, Stalin promised " free and unfettered elections" for all of the soviet occupied countries, such as Poland. Stalin promised to join the fight against the Japanese as well. Finally, Stalin promised to participate in the international conference, where the United Nations would become a reality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)